Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LeMaire v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LeMaire v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development Anchor | green | “arguments not raised before the district court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.” | 24 |
| 2 | Wilson Ex Rel. Fobb v. Bruks-Klockner, Inc. | green | “we must scrutinize that decision somewhat more closely, applying a de novo standard of review similar to that under which we review a dismissal under rule 12(b)(6).” | 3 |
| 3 | St. Tammany Parish Ex Rel. Davis v. Federal Emergency Management Agency | green | “our review is limited to determining whether the district court's application of the law is correct and, to the extent its decision was based on undisputed facts, whether those facts are indeed undisputed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.