Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Briscoe v. LaHue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Briscoe v. LaHue Anchor | green | “integral parts of the judicial process.” | 12 |
| 2 | Panitz v. Behrend | green | “the primary purpose of expert testimony is not to assist one party or another in winning the case but to assist the trier of the facts in understanding complicated matters.” | 4 |
| 3 | Duff v. Lewis | green | “lightning rod for harassing litigation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Duff v. Lewis | green | “exposure to liability could deter their acceptance of court appointments or color their recommendations.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada | green | “is a broad grant of immunity not just from the imposition of civil damages, but also from the burdens of litigation, generally.” | 3 |
| 6 | Calkins v. Sumner | green | “a witness's apprehension of subsequent damages liability might induce two forms of self-censorship.” | 3 |
| 7 | Simons v. Bellinger | green | “serve as an arm of the court and perform a function which traditionally belongs to the judiciary.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.