Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People Who Care v. Rockford Board Of Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People Who Care v. Rockford Board Of Education Anchor | green | “a good reason why a lower rate is essential.” | 12 |
| 2 | Robert Johnson v. G.D.F., Incorpora | green | “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” | 9 |
| 3 | Denius v. Dunlap | green | “derived from the market rate for the services rendered.” | 5 |
| 4 | Edsel Gusman, Cross-Appellant v. Unisys Corporation, Cross-Appellee | green | “a defendant's failure to do so is essentially a concession that the attorney's billing rate is reasonable and should be awarded.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.