Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Curley v. Amr Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curley v. Amr Corporation Anchor | green | “the first question to resolve in determining whether to undertake a choice of law analysis is whether there is an actual conflict of laws.” | 11 |
| 2 | Curley v. Amr Corporation | green | “in new york, the forum state in this case, the first question to resolve in determining whether to undertake a choice of law analysis is whether there is an actual conflict of laws.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Rescap Liquidating Trust (In re Residential Capital, LLC) | green | “the court may also grant some but not all of the relief requested in a summary judgment motion if it finds disputed issues of fact as to some of the issues presented.” | 6 |
| 4 | In Re: Gaston & Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, as Plan Administrator to the Estate of Gaston & Snow v. Robert A. Erkins & Bernadine Erkins | green | “bankruptcy courts confronting state law claims that do not implicate federal policy concerns should apply the choice of law rules of the forum state.” | 4 |
| 5 | Excess Insurance v. Factory Mutual Insurance | green | “if no conflict exists, then the court should apply the law of the forum state in which the action is being heard.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.