Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marilyn H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marilyn H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “the issue is not whether each incident of harassment standing alone is sufficient to sustain the cause of action in a hostile environment case, but whether-taken together-the reported incidents make out such a case.” | 17 |
| 2 | Sheridan v. Forest Hills Public Schools | green | “someone in the employer's chain of command who possesses the ability to exercise significant influence in the decision-making process of hiring, firing, and disciplining the offensive employee.” | 8 |
| 3 | Downey v. Charlevoix County Board | green | “in fact . . . created an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Sheridan v. Forest Hills Public Schools | green | “possesses the ability to exercise significant influence in the decision-making process of hiring, firing, and disciplining the offensive employee.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.