Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co Anchor | green | “where a healthcare provider claims unjust enrichment against an insurer, the benefit conferred, if any, is not the provision of the healthcare services per se, but rather the discharge of the obligation the insurer owes to its insured.” | 12 |
| 2 | Wade v. Kessler Institute | green | “to the extent plaintiff contends that a breach of the implied covenant may arise absent an express or implied contract, that contention finds no support in our case law.” | 7 |
| 3 | Woodlands Community Ass'n v. Mitchell | green | “require a determination that defendant has benefitted from plaintiff's performance.” | 6 |
| 4 | Saloojas, Inc. v. Aetna Health of California, Inc. | green | “we therefore hold that the cares act does not grant a private right of action to a provider of covid-19 diagnostic testing to enforce 3202.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.