Your MCP token and copy-and-paste setup for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and the rest are on the install page — filled in with your real credentials while you are signed in.
Delete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant — emailed to you with setup instructions, and always available under that icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Phelps.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Phelps Anchor | green | “the prohibition against double enhancements is based on the assumption that, in designating the appropriate range of punishment for a criminal offense, the legislature necessarily considered the factors inherent in the offense.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Perruquet | green | “a reasoned judgment as to the proper sentence to be imposed must be based upon the particular circumstances of each individual case.” | 8 |
| 3 | People v. Powell | green | “the legislature clearly intends to enhance the penalty based upon some aspect of the crime and that intention is clearly expressed.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. McFadden | green | “illinois law has long held that, in prosecutions for the offense of uuw by felon, the prior felony conviction is an element of the offense which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the state before the jury in its case in chief.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Easley | green | “any second or subsequent violation shall be a class 2 felony” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Powell | green | “a single factor cannot be used both as an element of an offense and as a basis for imposing a sentence harsher than might otherwise have been imposed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.