Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Laureano.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Laureano Anchor | green | “sentences imposed for two or more offenses may not run consecutively: (1) where a single act constitutes two offenses, or (2) where a single act constitutes one of the offenses and a material element of the other” | 14 |
| 2 | People v. Providence | green | “searching inquiry' to insure that defendant's request to proceed pro se was accompanied by a 'knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Horne | green | “did not request a hearing to determine the proper amount of restitution or otherwise challenge the amount of the restitution order during the sentencing proceeding” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Frazier | green | “the crime of burglary was completed when defendant entered the electronics store with the intent to commit a crime and the ensuing larceny was a separate crime, perpetrated through defendant's separate act of stealing property” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Allen | green | “who was not totally unfamiliar with criminal procedure, so determinedly and so unequivocally insisted on rejecting counsel and proceeding pro se, the court had no recourse but to permit him to do so” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.