Topic: sufficient factual matter to show that the claim is faciall… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #1313

8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 204 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Warren General Hospital v. Amgen Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Warren General Hospital v. Amgen Inc. Anchor
ca3 · 2011
green “sufficient factual matter to show that the claim is facially plausible,' thus enabling 'the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” 57
2 Craig Geness v. Administrative Office of Penns
ca3 · 2020
green “to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” 40
3 Wood v. Moss
scotus · 2014
green “not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation.” 30
4 Ana Alpizar-Fallas v. Frank Favero
ca3 · 2018
green “consider only the complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint, and matters of public record, as well as undisputedly authentic documents if the complainant's claims are based upon these documents.” 29
5 Wood v. Moss
scotus · 2014
green “are not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation.” 18
6 Host International Inc v. MarketPlace PHL LLC
ca3 · 2022
green “need not 'accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation.” 11
7 Quintez Talley v. Pushkalai Pillai
ca3 · 2024
green “accept all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true and view them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check