Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Rugato.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Rugato Anchor | green | “are entitled to great deference on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Mercado | green | “probable cause does not require proof to a mathematical certainty, or proof beyond a reasonable doubt” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Ketcham | green | “is challenged by a motion to suppress, the prosecution bears the burden of establishing that the officer imparting the information had probable cause to act” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Lypka | green | “officer is deemed to act with probable cause when acting at the direction of another law enforcement officer who has the requisite probable cause” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Carrasquillo | green | “at least more probable than not” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Gandy | green | “the legality of the police conduct in the first instance” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Bordeaux | green | “the police may not justify a stop by . . . subsequently acquired probable cause resulting from the stop” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.