Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney General Anchor | green | “set out any discrete arguments he relies on in support of that claim.” | 9 |
| 2 | Antonio A. Gonzalez v. U.S. Attorney General | green | “we do not consider issues that were not reached by the bia.” | 9 |
| 3 | Putu Indrawati v. U.S. Attorney General | green | “provide information sufficient to enable the bia to review and correct any errors below.” | 8 |
| 4 | Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney General | green | “unadorned, conclusory statements do not satisfy this requirement, and the petitioner must do more than make a passing reference to the issue.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.