Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Project Reflect, Inc. Smithson Craighead Middle School v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project Reflect, Inc. Smithson Craighead Middle School v. Metropolitan Nashville Board of Public Education Anchor | green | “plaintiffs . . . fail to plead the existence of a similarly situated comparator . . . therefore, the complaint does not contain sufficient factual matter to state a plausible claim.” | 17 |
| 2 | Solel Umani v. Michigan Dep't of Corrections | green | “the comparative prisoner 'must have dealt with the same decisionmaker, have been subject to the same standards, and have engaged in the same conduct without such differentiating or mitigating circumstances that would distinguish their conduct or the defendant's treatment of them…” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.