Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Youngkin v. Hines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Youngkin v. Hines Anchor | green | “legislative intent derives from an act as a whole rather than from isolated portions of it.” | 13 |
| 2 | in Re the Office of the Attorney General | green | “legislative intent derives from an act as a whole rather than from isolated portions of it.” | 8 |
| 3 | State v. Paul Reed Harper | green | “we ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent as expressed in the language of the statute.” | 7 |
| 4 | ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, Robert W. Caudle and Ricky Stowe v. Travis G. Coleman | green | “constitute an exercise of the right of association under the tcpa, the nature of the 'communication between individuals who join together' must involve public or citizen's participation.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.