Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd. Anchor | green | “party seeking to seal court records has the burden to demonstrate compelling circumstances to justify restricting public access” | 16 |
| 2 | Dawson v. White & Case | green | “ought not to be required to make their private financial information public ... where no substantial public interest would be furthered by public access to that information.” | 11 |
| 3 | Madden v. Atkins | green | “rest on a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial action.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.