Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 204 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle Francis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle Francis Anchor | green | “de novo review requires that we consider a matter anew, as if no decision had been made previously.” | 102 |
| 2 | United States v. Hinkson | green | “identified the correct legal rule to apply to the relief requested” | 65 |
| 3 | In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle Francis | green | “we consider a matter anew, as if no decision had been made previously.” | 30 |
| 4 | In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle Francis | green | “consider a matter anew, as if no decision had been made previously.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.