Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kenneth W. Benda v. Grand Lodge Of The International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenneth W. Benda v. Grand Lodge Of The International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Anchor | green | “extremes of a single continuum.” | 9 |
| 2 | State of California v. Block | green | “pragmatic judgment whether the eis's form, content and preparation foster both informed decision-making and informed public participation.” | 7 |
| 3 | Oregon Environmental Council v. Leonard Kunzman | green | “nepa is essentially a procedural statute.” | 6 |
| 4 | The Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Joe Christie | green | “probability of success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury or that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardship tips sharply in its favor.” | 4 |
| 5 | Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-Intervenor | green | “nepa clearly requires that consideration of environmental impacts of proposed projects take place before” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.