Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gregory Dale English v. R. Michael Cody, Warden, Laveita Osborn Ogden v. Neville Massey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregory Dale English v. R. Michael Cody, Warden, Laveita Osborn Ogden v. Neville Massey Anchor | green | “on habeas review, this court does not address issues that have been defaulted in state court on an independent and adequate state procedural ground, unless the petitioner can demonstrate cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice.” | 11 |
| 2 | DeLozier v. Sirmons | green | “counsel is not required to keep hiring experts until the most favorable one possible is found.” | 3 |
| 3 | Welch v. State | green | “did not turn on facts or information unavailable at the time of his direct appeal.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Avalos | green | “when a petitioner fails to properly raise his federal claims in state court, he deprives the state of an opportunity to address those claims in the first instance and frustrates the state's ability to honor his constitutional rights.” | 3 |
| 5 | Welch v. State | green | “a reasonable likelihood the jury failed to consider the evidence offered in mitigation.” | 3 |
| 6 | Welch v. State | green | “could have had no impact on the sentencing decision.” | 3 |
| 7 | Welch v. State | green | “it would only have served to strengthen the state's theory that welch killed the victim when he failed to provide the drugs.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.