Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 202 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California Anchor | green | “in the absence of a clear legislative mandate, the advisory committee notes provide a reliable source of insight into the meaning of” | 99 |
| 2 | Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School District | green | “make an informed, final determination.” | 82 |
| 3 | Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School District | green | “make an informed, final decision.” | 21 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.