Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, Director.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beunka Adams v. Rick Thaler, Director Anchor | green | “we review a district court's grant of a stay of execution for abuse of discretion.” | 9 |
| 2 | Ayestas v. Davis | green | “authorizes federal courts to provide funding to a party who is facing the prospect of a death sentence and is 'financially unable to obtain adequate representation or investigative, expert, or other reasonably necessary services.” | 5 |
| 3 | Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, Director | green | “the quality of the mitigation evidence the petitioner would have introduced at sentencing has no bearing on his claim of actual innocence of the death penalty.” | 3 |
| 4 | Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, Director | green | “article 11.071 . . . to mean that petitioners must make a threshold showing that the applicant is actually innocent of the death penalty.” | 3 |
| 5 | Chester Lee Wicker v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections | green | “in the absence of a declaration by the higher court that the executions should be stayed in cases presenting the issue raised by murphy, we must follow our circuit's precedents and deny . . . a stay of execution on this issue.” | 3 |
| 6 | Cooey v. Strickland | green | “a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus” | 3 |
| 7 | Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA | green | “unlike a preliminary injunction, a stay does not actively prohibit conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.