Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cadle Co. v. Hayes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cadle Co. v. Hayes Anchor | green | “may reasonably be resolved in favor of either party.” | 13 |
| 2 | Herbert W. Price, Etc. v. General Motors Corporation, Herbert W. Price, Etc. v. General Motors Corporation | green | “every essential element of its claim or defense is at least trialworthy.” | 10 |
| 3 | Herbert W. Price, Etc. v. General Motors Corporation, Herbert W. Price, Etc. v. General Motors Corporation | green | “the nonmoving party cannot fend off summary judgment unless it makes a competent demonstration that every essential element of its claim or defense is at least trialworthy.” | 3 |
| 4 | Karen Lynn Bienkowski, David Eberle, Delia Ann Hoye and Edward McDonald v. Northeastern University | green | “conclusory allegations, improbable inferences, and unsupported speculation will not suffice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.