Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gwinn v. Awmiller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gwinn v. Awmiller Anchor | green | “we review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court pursuant to rule 56(c) of the federal rules of civil procedure.” | 9 |
| 2 | Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co. | green | “but we are governed by federal law in determining the propriety of the district court's grant of summary judgment.” | 7 |
| 3 | Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co. | green | “1) the named insured, 2) resident relatives of the named insured, 3) passengers occupying the insured's vehicle with the consent of the insured, and 4) pedestrians who are injured by the covered vehicle.” | 6 |
| 4 | Allstate Insurance Co. v. Parfrey | green | “must be resolved under the totality of the circumstances.” | 4 |
| 5 | Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance | green | “brennan and thompson reformed those insurance policies to include extended pedestrian coverage that insurers should have offered under section 710.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.