Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cabinetree of Wisconsin, Incorporated v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cabinetree of Wisconsin, Incorporated v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Incorporated Anchor | green | “an election to proceed before a nonarbitral tribunal for the resolution of a contractual dispute is a presumptive waiver of the right to arbitrate.” | 11 |
| 2 | E360 Insight, Inc. v. Spamhaus Project | green | “not in isolation but in light of 'the entire procedural history of the case.” | 6 |
| 3 | Johnson v. Trueblood | green | “adequately inform the attor- ney of ... the conduct of the attorney that is the subject of the inquiry, and the specific reason this conduct may justify rev- ocation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Johnson v. Trueblood | green | “believed that some type of notice and an opportunity to respond are necessary when a district court seeks to revoke an attorney's pro hac vice status.” | 3 |
| 5 | Patterson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company Cairo-Sikeston | green | “replete with delays, non-responses to court orders, and missed deadlines.” | 3 |
| 6 | Michael Magruder v. Fidelity Brokerage Services | green | “the federal arbitration act, 9 u.s.c. 1-16, does not grant federal jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.