Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 201 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. Babin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Incorporated v. Babin Anchor | green | “the plaintiff must present more than a scintilla of evidence in support of his position; the evidence must be such that a jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff.” | 137 |
| 2 | Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio Corporation | green | “a district court is not... obligated to wade through and search the entire record for some specific facts that might support the nonmoving party's claim.” | 59 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.