Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 200 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from GALLOP & MILAVETZ, P. A., ET AL v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GALLOP & MILAVETZ, P. A., ET AL v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE Anchor | green | “to correct perceived abuses of the bankruptcy system.” | 49 |
| 2 | In the Matter Of: Peter Francis Geraci | green | “the bankruptcy court is authorized to act whenever it determines that the compensation the debtor has paid or agreed to pay his counsel exceeds the reasonable value of the services provided.” | 35 |
| 3 | George T. Carlson & Associates v. United States Bankruptcy Court (In Re Ingersoll) | green | “attorney has failed to properly delegate tasks or has billed at his/her full hourly rate for tasks which should have been delegated to a professional who bills at a lower hourly rate;” | 35 |
| 4 | Shotkoski v. Fokkena (In Re Shotkoski) | green | “a definition for 'fully administered' does not appear anywhere in the code or the rules.” | 35 |
| 5 | In re Tabor | green | “take any action or make any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process.” | 35 |
| 6 | Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. | green | “usually at least, when we're engaged in the business of interpreting statutes we presume differences in language like this convey differences in meaning.” | 6 |
| 7 | Schroeder v. Rouse (In Re Redding) | green | “the comparison of the amount of compensation received by the attorney with the reasonable value of the services performed.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.