Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Runyon v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Runyon v. State Anchor | green | “to show facts related to an inability to pay and indicating sufficient bona fide efforts to pay so as to persuade the trial court that further imprisonment should not be ordered.” | 10 |
| 2 | Williams v. State | green | “if the person commits an additional crime, the court may revoke the probation.” | 6 |
| 3 | Runyon v. State | green | “it is the state's burden to prove both the violation and the requisite state of mind in order to obtain a probation revocation.” | 5 |
| 4 | Smith v. State | green | “because the phrase 'recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally' appears in the disjunctive and thus prescribes alternative considerations, the state of mind requirement may be satisfied by adequate evidence that a defendant's failure to pay a probation imposed financial obligation …” | 4 |
| 5 | Whatley v. State | green | “only has to be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.