Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc. Anchor | green | “the concept of unreasonable danger, which is determinative of whether a product is defective in a design case, is presented to the jury as an ultimate issue without further definition.” | 5 |
| 2 | Engel v. Corrigan Co.-Mechanical Contractors, Inc. | green | “(1) the defendant sold a product in the course of its business; (2) the product was then in a defective condition, unreasonably dangerous when put to a reasonably anticipated use; (3) the product was used in a manner reasonably anticipated; and (4) plaintiff was damaged as a dir…” | 4 |
| 3 | Littlefield v. Edmonds | green | “a plaintiff seeking to recover for fraudulent concealment must show all of the following: (1) the fact was not within the fair and reasonable reach of the plaintiff; (2) the plaintiff was unable to discover the concealed information; and (3) plaintiff exercised reasonable dilige…” | 4 |
| 4 | Richardson v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. | green | “state common law only affords a remedy to individuals who can establish that tobacco products rather than their own negligence or disregard of the inherent risks of tobacco caused them to suffer injuries.” | 4 |
| 5 | Kansas City v. W.R. Grace & Co. | green | “occurrence of the last overt act charged resulting in damage to the plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 6 | Theresa Graham v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company | green | “concluded that federal tobacco laws do not preempt state tort claims based on the dangerousness of all the cigarettes manufactured by the tobacco companies.” | 4 |
| 7 | Theresa Graham v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company | green | “may employ its police power to regulate cigarette sales and to impose tort liability on cigarette manufacturers” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.