Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bisch v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bisch v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Anchor | green | “that (1) the duration of the challenged action is relatively short, (2) there is a likelihood that a similar issue will arise in the future, and (3) the matter is important.” | 10 |
| 2 | National Collegiate Athletic Association v. University of Nevada | green | “cases presenting real controversies at the time of their institution may become moot by the happening of subsequent events.” | 10 |
| 3 | Bisch v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department | green | “(1) the duration of the challenged action is relatively short, (2) there is a likelihood that a similar issue will arise in the future, and (3) the matter is important.” | 5 |
| 4 | Personhood Nevada v. Bristol | green | “involves a matter of widespread importance that is capable of repetition, yet evading review.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.