Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Le Mier.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Le Mier Anchor | green | “district courts possess broad discretionary authority to decide what sanction to impose when a discovery order is violated.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. GROSSETETE | green | “as a practical matter, we must decide the merits of the issues the state raises in order to determine if it has a constitutional right to appeal.” | 5 |
| 3 | Harrison Ex Rel. Harrison v. Board of Regents | green | “an abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances of the case.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Heinsen | green | “the state's right to appeal an adverse ruling in a criminal proceeding exists only by constitutional provision, statute, or rule.” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. GROSSETETE | green | “the district court acted within its discretionary authority” | 4 |
| 6 | State v. Le Mier | green | “to avail themselves of, and impose, meaningful sanctions where discovery orders are not obeyed and a party's conduct injects needless delay into the proceedings.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.