Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pliura Intervenors v. Illinois Commerce Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pliura Intervenors v. Illinois Commerce Commission Anchor | green | “demonstrating that it has made reasonable attempts to obtain easements, through good-faith negotiations.” | 6 |
| 2 | Enbridge Energy, LLC v. Kuerth | green | “is akin to a hybrid proceeding in which specific presumptions must be rebutted by landowners challenging the condemnation filing at issue.” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Garrett | green | “the appellate court is empowered under rule 615(b) to remand a cause for a hearing on a particular matter while retaining jurisdiction.” | 5 |
| 4 | Department of Transportation v. Rasmussen | green | “where a witness has considered improper elements of damage, his testimony will be deemed incompetent, even though in part based upon proper elements.” | 5 |
| 5 | City of Springfield v. West Koke Mill Development Corp. | green | “koke mill did not support its traverse motion with any evidence of the city of springfield's lack of a good faith offer.” | 4 |
| 6 | Pliura Intervenors v. Illinois Commerce Commission | green | “was fit, willing, and able to construct, operate, and maintain” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.