Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bernal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bernal Anchor | green | “in which a single act results in multiple charges under different criminal statutes.” | 8 |
| 2 | State v. Ramirez | green | “protects defendants from receiving multiple punishments for the same offense.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Silvas | green | “subsumed within the other, then the analysis ends and the statutes are considered the same for double jeopardy purposes.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Franco | green | “separate punishments may be imposed if the offenses are separated by sufficient indicia of distinctness.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Ramirez | green | “the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment, enforced against the states by the fourteenth amendment, protects defendants from receiving multiple punishments for the same offense.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Franco | green | “we consider such factors as whether acts were close in time and space, their similarity, the sequence in which they occurred, whether other events intervened, and the defendant's goals for and mental state during each act.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.