Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 197 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boulos v. Lerner-Harrington.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boulos v. Lerner-Harrington Anchor | green | “a defendant moving for summary judgment in a negligence action has the burden of establishing, prima facie, that he or she was not at fault in the happening of the subject accident” | 83 |
| 2 | Cox v. Nunez | green | “there can be more than one proximate cause of an accident” | 45 |
| 3 | Cox v. Nunez | green | “generally, it is for the trier of fact to determine the issue of proximate cause” | 18 |
| 4 | Kalland v. Hungry Harbor Associates | green | “however, the issue of proximate cause may be decided as a matter of law where only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts” | 18 |
| 5 | Kalland v. Hungry Harbor Associates | green | “generally, it is for the trier of fact to determine the issue of proximate cause” | 10 |
| 6 | Lapidus v. State | green | “the plaintiff in a negligence action 'must generally show that the defendant's negligence was a substantial cause of the events which produced the injury” | 6 |
| 7 | Boulos v. Lerner-Harrington | green | “in determining a motion for summary judgment, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party” | 5 |
| 8 | Boulos v. Lerner-Harrington | green | “defendant moving for summary judgment in a negligence action has the burden of establishing, prima facie, that he or she was not at fault in the happening of the subject accident” | 4 |
| 9 | Estate of Cook v. Gomez | green | “generally, it is for the trier of fact to determine the issue of proximate cause” | 4 |
| 10 | Kalland v. Hungry Harbor Associates | green | “additionally, there may be more than one proximate cause” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.