7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Industries Group v. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Industries Group v. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. Anchor | green | “the enforcement of an international forum selection clause is not an issue of comity. it is a matter of contract enforcement and giving effect to substantive rights that the parties have agreed upon.” | 4 |
| 2 | Jones Apparel Group, Inc. v. Maxwell Shoe Co. | green | “the broadest grant of power in the english-speaking world to establish the most appropriate internal organization and structure for the enterprise.” | 3 |
| 3 | Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension Fund | green | “the securities act of 1933 . . . protects investors by ensuring that companies issuing securities (known as 'issuers') make a 'full and fair disclosure of information' relevant to a public offering.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Barnes | green | “the starting point for the interpretation of a statute begins with the statute's language.” | 3 |
| 5 | Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund | green | “did nothing to strip state courts of their longstanding jurisdiction to adjudicate class actions alleging only 1933 act violations. neither did slusa authorize removing such suits from state to federal court.” | 3 |
| 6 | Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp. | green | “the bylaws cannot fairly be argued to regulate a novel subject matter: the plaintiffs ignore that, in the analogous contexts of llc agreements and stockholder agreements, the supreme court and this court have held that forum- selection clauses are valid.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Foote | green | “when there are two acts on the same subject the rule is to give effect to both if possible. but if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the later act, without any repealing clause, operates to the extent of the repugnancy as a repeal of the first.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.