Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Detention of LaBelle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re the Detention of LaBelle Anchor | green | “a factual basis for concluding that the individual is not receiving or would not receive, if released, such care as is essential for their health or safety.” | 11 |
| 2 | In Re the Detention of LaBelle | green | “the individual is unable, because of severe deterioration of mental functioning, to make a rational decision with respect to their need for treatment.” | 10 |
| 3 | In Re The Detention Of L.K. | neutral | “based on the evidence and issues presented to the commissioner.” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re The Detention Of A.f. | green | “regarding witness credibility or the persuasiveness of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.