Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “a lost opportunity to compete in a fair competitive bidding process for a contract is sufficient to demonstrate irreparable harm.” | 11 |
| 2 | United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United States | green | “the public has a strong interest in preserving the integrity of the procurement process.” | 10 |
| 3 | BINL, Inc. v. United States | green | “irreparable harm is established by a lost opportunity to fairly compete.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.