Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton Anchor | green | “the fourth amendment does not protect all subjective expectations of privacy, but only those that society recognizes as 'legitimate.” | 13 |
| 2 | Herrera v. SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS | green | “in the criminal context, reasonableness usually requires a showing of probable cause.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Sanchez | green | “proffer clear and positive testimony that consent was unequivocal and specific and intelligently given,” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Sanchez | green | “(1) 'proffer clear and positive testimony that consent was unequivocal and specific and intelligently given,' and (2) the officers must have used no 'implied or express duress or coercion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.