Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts Anchor | green | “unless each of these criteria is met, a district court lacks jurisdiction to devise remedies to force an agency to comply with the foia's disclosure requirements.” | 19 |
| 2 | New York Times Co. v. United States Department of Labor | green | “prior to judicial review, the plaintiff must exhaust his administrative remedies.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.