Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Anchor | green | “especially reluctant to recognize a privilege in an area where it appears that congress has considered the relevant competing concerns but has not provided the privilege itself.” | 14 |
| 2 | Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc. | green | “narrow class of decisions that do not terminate the litigation, but must, in the interest of achieving a healthy legal system, nonetheless be treated as final.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.