Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Riggins v. Goodman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Riggins v. Goodman Anchor | green | “when a defendant asserts qualified immunity at summary judgment, the burden shifts to the plaintiff, who must clear two hurdles in order to defeat the defendant's motion.” | 19 |
| 2 | Medina v. Cram | green | “because of the underlying purposes of qualified immunity, the tenth circuit reviews summary judgment orders deciding qualified immunity questions differently from other summary judgment decisions.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.