Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Christian Heritage Academy, a Private Corporation v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Association, a Not-For-Profit Association.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christian Heritage Academy, a Private Corporation v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Association, a Not-For-Profit Association Anchor | green | “cross motions for summary judgment are to be treated separately; the denial of one does not require the grant of another.” | 14 |
| 2 | Jacklovich v. Simmons | green | “on cross-motions for summary judgment, . . . we must view the inferences to be drawn from affidavits, attached exhibits and depositions in the light most favorable to the party that did not prevail.” | 7 |
| 3 | Dirty Boyz Sanitation Serv., Inc. v. City of Rawlins | green | “where, as here, we are presented with cross-motions for summary judgment, we must view each motion separately, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and draw all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.