Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Averill Briggs v. Randy Grounds.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Averill Briggs v. Randy Grounds Anchor | green | “we too have a transcript of voir dire and a batson claim fairly presented, and that is all miller-el requires.” | 4 |
| 2 | Musladin v. Lamarque | green | “significant consequences for the accused.” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Harris | green | “sorry spectacle of prosecutorial offices publicly vying with each other to have 'first crack' at convicting the accused” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Ayala | green | “no matters of trial strategy were revealed” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Ayala | green | “the challenged jurors were excluded for proper, race-neutral reasons.” | 4 |
| 6 | Boyd v. Newland | green | “comparative juror analysis is an important tool that courts should utilize in assessing batson claims.” | 4 |
| 7 | Boyd v. Newland | green | “to an examination of a prosecutor's questions to prospective jurors and the jurors' responses, to see whether the prosecutor treated otherwise similar jurors differently because of their membership in a particular group.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.