Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Chicago v. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Chicago v. Federal Emergency Management Agency Anchor | green | “may not al- ways dictate precisely the same approach to the conduct of the litigation” | 4 |
| 2 | Wisconsin Education Ass'n Council v. Walker | green | “based on a right that belongs to the proposed intervenor rather than to an ex- isting party in the suit.” | 4 |
| 3 | State of Illinois v. City of Chicago | green | “(1) timely application; (2) an interest relating to the subject matter of the action; (3) poten- tial impairment, as a practical matter, of that interest by the disposition of the action; and (4) lack of adequate representa- tion of the interest by the existing parties to the ac…” | 4 |
| 4 | State of Illinois v. City of Chicago | green | “because denial of a motion to intervene essentially ends the litigation for the movant, such orders are final and appeal- able.” | 4 |
| 5 | Driftless Area Land Conservanc v. Michael Huebsch | green | “interests and objectives overlap in certain respects” | 4 |
| 6 | Driftless Area Land Conservanc v. Michael Huebsch | green | “require a more discriminating comparison of the absen- tee's interests and the interests of existing parties.” | 4 |
| 7 | Driftless Area Land Conservanc v. Michael Huebsch | green | “the com- mission regulates the transmission companies, it does not ad- vocate for them or represent their interests.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.