Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United States Anchor | green | “the plaintiff has the burden of proving jurisdiction in order to survive the motion.” | 14 |
| 2 | Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. Behrens | green | “in general, the rule 12(b)(6) inquiry is limited to the allegations in the complaint, which are accepted as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff” | 10 |
| 3 | Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United States | green | “when subject matter jurisdiction is challenged under rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff has the burden of proving jurisdiction in order to survive the motion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.