Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Philip Fiore, Also Known as Pete, and Louis J. Bombacino, Also Known as John Lordo, Also Known as Louie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Philip Fiore, Also Known as Pete, and Louis J. Bombacino, Also Known as John Lordo, Also Known as Louie Anchor | green | “must look beyond formalistic expressions of culpability and determine whether the defendant has manifested an acceptance of responsibility for his offense in a moral sense.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Philip Fiore, Also Known as Pete, and Louis J. Bombacino, Also Known as John Lordo, Also Known as Louie | green | “sentencing courts must look beyond formalistic expressions of culpability and determine whether the defendant has manifested an acceptance of responsibility for his offense in a moral sense.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Carmella Dawson | green | “were dawson's co-schemers to pay rush hospital any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify dawson of that occurrence so that she could properly file a request for modification of restitution” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Kevin P. Sensmeier and Neil E. Sensmeier | green | “the economic circumstances of a defendant cannot be considered by the court when fixing the amount of the 24 nos. 19-1734 19-1745 restitution.” | 4 |
| 5 | Robers v. United States | green | “and the government has conceded that the statute (whether through these or other provisions) provides room for credits against an offender's restitution obligation to prevent double recovery to the victim.” | 4 |
| 6 | Robers v. United States | green | “in such cases, i would place on the defendant the burden to show-with evidence specific to the market at issue-that a victim delayed unreasonably in selling collateral, manifesting a choice to hold the collateral.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Terry Smith | green | “defendant's grudging and incomplete admission, accompanied by an excuse to minimize his own culpability, does not indicate an acceptance nos. 19-1734 19-1745 15 of responsibility.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.