Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Radecki v. Director of Bureau of Worker's Disability Compensation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radecki v. Director of Bureau of Worker's Disability Compensation Anchor | green | “when a michigan statute adopts by reference a federal law that is subsequently amended, but the michigan statute remains unchanged, the courts are constitutionally required to construe the statute as continuing to refer to the original federal enactment before amendment.” | 6 |
| 2 | Dearborn Independent, Inc. v. City of Dearborn | green | “unlawfully attempts to delegate to the united states post-office department the determination of the qualifications of a newspaper to publish legal notices.” | 6 |
| 3 | Taylor v. Gate Pharmaceuticals | green | “established and essentially unchanging.” | 6 |
| 4 | Dearborn Independent, Inc. v. City of Dearborn | green | “shall have been admitted by the united states post-office department for transmission as mail matter of the second class . . . .” | 5 |
| 5 | Coffman v. State Board of Examiners in Optometry | green | “power to determine some fact or state of things upon which the law makes, or intends to make, its own action depend.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.