Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Martin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Martin Anchor | green | “the absence of a notation in the record indicating that defendant was present is not sufficient to demonstrate that he was not present” | 6 |
| 2 | Van Dusen v. McMaster | green | “broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument” | 6 |
| 3 | People v. Andrew | green | “failed to come forward with substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity that attaches to all criminal proceedings” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Johnson | green | “a state of mind that was likely to preclude them from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at the trial” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Chase | green | “where evidence of a prior uncharged crime contains more probative value than risk of prejudice to the defendant, the evidence is admissible” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Ferrer | green | “it is perfectly well settled that a trial court is entitled to give weight to the findings of competency derived from the ordered examinations” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Wolff | green | “grossly unqualified to serve in the case” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.