Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wolf v. Meister-Neiberg, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolf v. Meister-Neiberg, Inc. Anchor | green | “on the other hand, obiter dictum or dicta is an opinion expressed by the court on a legal question casually reached by the court on an issue unrelated to the essence of the controversy or based on hypothetical facts.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re County Treasurer and Ex-Officio Coll. | green | “allows for an extension of 'time within which any act provided by law' is to be done, if the expiration of performance occurs on a saturday, sunday, or holiday.” | 4 |
| 3 | Larson v. Johnson | green | “on the other hand, obiter dictum or dicta is an opinion expressed by the court on a legal question casually reached by the court on an issue unrelated to the essence of the controversy or based on hypothetical facts.” | 4 |
| 4 | In re Application of the County Treasurer | green | “a purchaser or assignee shall not be entitled to a tax deed to the property sold unless.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re Application of the County Treasurer | green | “following the enactment and amendment of the post-sale notice provision, any amendments to the tax deed provision were merely technical in nature or otherwise made changes that were unrelated to the 'strict compliance' language.” | 4 |
| 6 | In re Application of the County Treasurer | green | “in 1970, the tax deed provision was amended to specify that 'the court shall insist on strict compliance with the provisions of section 263 of this act,' section 263 being the pre-expiration notice provision.” | 4 |
| 7 | Midwest Real Estate Investment Co. v. Anderson | green | “given the potential for any omission or error to inject confusion (however slight) into the redemption process,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.