Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Iowa v. Justin Dean Short.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Iowa v. Justin Dean Short Anchor | green | “nearly identical provision to the fourth amendment to the united states constitution.” | 5 |
| 2 | State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael Gaskins | green | “because this case concerns the constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, our review of the district court's suppression ruling is de novo.” | 5 |
| 3 | Daniel King v. State of Iowa | green | “we reserve the right to apply the principles differently under the state constitution compared to its federal counterpart.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Will | green | “before police can enter or search without a warrant in reliance on third-party consent, they must inquire and ascertain whether the consenting party has common authority; they cannot rely on subjective good faith.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Wright | green | “oh, it's not my place, but go ahead.” | 3 |
| 6 | State of Iowa v. Hillary Lee Tyler | green | “warrantless searches are per se unreasonable if they do not fall within one of the well-recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.” | 3 |
| 7 | State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr. | green | “reasonably (though erroneously)” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.