Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Infante.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Infante Anchor | green | “upon revocation of probation . . . the trial court is limited only by the maximum sentence that it could have imposed originally at the time of the probationary sentence.” | 14 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Infante | green | “upon revocation of probation ... the trial court is limited only by the maximum sentence that it could have imposed originally at the time of the probationary sentence.” | 9 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Ferguson | green | “it is within our scope of review to consider challenges to the discretionary aspects of an appellant's sentence in an appeal following a revocation of probation.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.