Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. v. T.A. Operating Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Solar Applications Engineering, Inc. v. T.A. Operating Corp. Anchor | green | “a condition precedent is an event that must happen or be performed before a right can accrue to enforce an obligation.” | 16 |
| 2 | Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co. v. Cimco Refrigeration, Inc. | green | “it is a fundamental principle of contract law that when one party to a contract commits a material breach of that contract, the other party is discharged or excused from further performance.” | 10 |
| 3 | Bartush-Schnitzius Foods Co. v. Cimco Refrigeration, Inc. | green | “one party to a contract commits a material breach of that contract, the other party is discharged or excused from further performance” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.