Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Smith Anchor | green | “a defendant may use a pretrial writ of habeas corpus only in very limited circumstances.” | 10 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Smith | green | “only in very limited circumstances.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Gutierrez | green | “if we conclude the grounds on appeal are not cognizable, then we must affirm the trial court's denial of habeas corpus relief.” | 5 |
| 4 | Ex Parte Gonzales | green | “fundamentally unfair under the facts and circumstances” | 4 |
| 5 | Ex parte Walsh | green | “due process claims are not generally cognizable for pretrial habeas relief.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.