Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hanson v. Zoller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hanson v. Zoller Anchor | green | “the fundamental purpose of the recording statutes is to protect potential purchasers of real property against the risk that they may be paying out good money to someone who does not actually own the property that he is purporting to sell.” | 5 |
| 2 | Hanson v. Zoller | green | “the recording acts operate by making the history of the title involved in a real estate transaction readily available to a prospective purchaser, and by providing that the history so disclosed by the record is binding upon a prospective purchaser whether he consults the record o…” | 5 |
| 3 | Capps v. Weflen | green | “an auditor's plat is made for taxation purposes for the convenience of the tax officials in 8 describing the property on the tax rolls and does not confer rights in or transfer title to land.” | 3 |
| 4 | Capps v. Weflen | green | “recording documents is a ministerial action on the part of a county recorder.” | 3 |
| 5 | Berg v. Jaeger | green | “to be enforceable 4 by mandamus, the law must require an act to be done; mandamus cannot compel an official's discretionary actions.” | 3 |
| 6 | Burgum v. Jaeger | neutral | “a petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show a clear legal right to performance of the act sought to be compelled and must establish no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law.” | 3 |
| 7 | Nevin v. Kennedy | neutral | “purports to convey only a certain parcel within witzig's fifth subdivision,” | 3 |
| 8 | 4201 2nd Ave W v. First State Bank & Trust | neutral | “the legal conclusion of whether a deed is void is a question of law, fully reviewable on appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.